Plasma Center · Michigan

Roseville 10077

Roseville, MI · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseville 10077 runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Plasma Center workplace, earning a grade A.

Roseville 10077: 1.6 TCR = 42% of Plasma Center BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseville 10077 safety composite

Roseville 10077 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Roseville 10077 held a steady TCR band

Roseville 10077's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.3 in 2022 to 2.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621991 · Roseville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/69
  • PHOTO Kokomo, IN-Biolife 611
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kokomo, IN-Biolife 611 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Roseville 10077 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseville 10077 averages 1.6 TCR (42% of the Plasma Center BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseville 10077 TCR series: 2022=2.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Roseville 10077 falls in its industry

1,713 Plasma Center establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 69 Plasma Center employers in Michigan.

Roseville 10077 (49 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseville 10077
Roseville 10077 (49 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Roseville 10077 has more employees than the Plasma Center median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621991 · MI · Roseville

1,713 Plasma Center employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kokomo, IN-Biolife 611 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewisville, TX-BioLife 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlotte 418 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philadelphia 10145 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1003 Canal St 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller-Davis Company 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gundlach Champion, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLOSNER CONSTRUCTION & SALES INC 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4003 - TPG/PBM 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009) 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2959 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCO Engineering, Inc. 417 FTE
NAT-TCR ACCO Engineered Systems 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lubrizol Advanced Materials Inc Bowling Green 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR BTS Chillers 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR South Durham Operations 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pensacola 10623 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio 10157 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tempe 10048 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raleigh 10231 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.