Elementary and Secondary Schools · Minnesota

Roseville Area Middle School

Roseville, MN · ~129 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseville Area Middle School runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Elementary and Secondary Schools workplace, earning a grade D.

Roseville Area Middle School: 2.6 TCR = 186% of Elementary and Secondary Schools BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseville Area Middle School safety composite

Roseville Area Middle School scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Roseville Area Middle School injury rate improved

Roseville Area Middle School's TCR fell 0.5 from 5.3 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Roseville, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.6 · 186% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #556/1589
  • PHOTO JCC Middle School
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JCC Middle School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Roseville Area Middle School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseville Area Middle School averages 2.6 TCR (186% of the Elementary and Secondary Schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseville Area Middle School TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 1.4

Where Roseville Area Middle School falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and Secondary Schoo establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #556 safest of 1589 Elementary and Secondary Schoo employers in Minnesota.

Roseville Area Middle School (129 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseville Area Middle School
Roseville Area Middle School (129 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Roseville Area Middle School has more employees than the Elementary and Secondary Schools median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 4 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 4.2 3.2 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2017 5.3 4.3 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Roseville

3,374 Elementary and Secondary Schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JCC Middle School 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. James Elementary 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Board of Education 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAINE SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Long Prairie 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stanton 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knutson Construction Rochester 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE CECO Concrete : Minneapolis 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Uniserve Project Management Corp 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Safe Harbor Access Systems II, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amarillo Tx 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa Palm River 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Luther Family Ford 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recon Refractory & Construction, Inc. 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jonesboro Coca-Cola 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lewis & Tibbitts, Inc. 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.