Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing · Tennessee

Royal Sterilization Systems

New Tazewell, TN · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Royal Sterilization Systems runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Royal Sterilization Systems: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Royal Sterilization Systems safety composite

Royal Sterilization Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Royal Sterilization Systems: 0.0 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Royal Sterilization Systems's TCR rose 6.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · New Tazewell, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/21
  • PHOTO Axonics
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Axonics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Royal Sterilization Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Royal Sterilization Systems averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Royal Sterilization Systems TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Royal Sterilization Systems falls in its industry

555 Sterilizers, hospital and surg establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 21 Sterilizers, hospital and surg employers in Tennessee.

Royal Sterilization Systems (27 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Royal Sterilization Systems
Royal Sterilization Systems (27 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Royal Sterilization Systems has fewer employees than the Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · TN · New Tazewell

555 Sterilizers, hospital and surgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 20 employers in New Tazewell, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Axonics 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Purewick 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire-Dex Pelham 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paragon Medical - Smithfield 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Montgomery County Power Station 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Millwrights & Consultants, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Millwright Service 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cumberland Valley Constructors, Inc. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR England Furniture 1,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR England, Inc. 1,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clayton Giles 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janco Inc. 155 FTE
NAT-TCR Libby 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dirt Cheap #501 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta GA Sales Admin 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AST Shawnee Health Clinic 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blue Cube - Roberta Operations 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAA Concrete Products, Inc. dba 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Lumber Company 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE abelmfg 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.