Building cleaning services, janitorial · Oklahoma

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group

Oklahoma City, OK · ~73 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group: 0.9 TCR = 20% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group safety composite

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2022→2023

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group injury rate improved

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Oklahoma City, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/64
  • PHOTO GenesisMedCtrDavenpo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GenesisMedCtrDavenportEast EVS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group averages 0.9 TCR (20% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 64 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Oklahoma.

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group (73 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group
RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group (73 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · OK · Oklahoma City

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,293 employers in Oklahoma City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GenesisMedCtrDavenportEast EVS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Key People Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEMORIAL HERMANN NORTHEAST HOS 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE OG&E-Central District Office 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashton Gray OFS, LLC. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwarz Paving Company Inc 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE HollyFrontier Refinery Tulsa OK - BSL 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OKC1 3,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OKC1 3,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony Hospital 3,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR OK005 3,027 FTE
NAT-TCR Fluid System Components Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Master Machine Works, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Hamilton 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vane Line Bunkering, LLC - Baltimore 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richmond Primoid, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living 119th IL 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowman Asphalt Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE MTI Ready Mix 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.