Building cleaning services, janitorial · Massachusetts

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street

Boston, MA · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street: 0.9 TCR = 20% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street safety composite

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street held a steady TCR band

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Boston, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/84
  • PHOTO GenesisMedCtrDavenpo…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GenesisMedCtrDavenportEast EVS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street averages 0.9 TCR (20% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · BLS 4.5

Where UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 84 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Massachusetts.

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street (43 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street
UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street (43 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

UG2 - 255 - Tishman - 1 Federal Street has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MA · Boston

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 577 employers in Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GenesisMedCtrDavenportEast EVS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RT Hoffman Inc., Aspen Services Group 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Key People Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEMORIAL HERMANN NORTHEAST HOS 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Joe Czajkowski Farm/Lakeside Organics of Hadley 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guaranteed Builders and Developers Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Comfort, Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acella 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Massachusetts General Hospital 26,855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Women's Hospital 19,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Womens Hospital 19,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham & Women's Hospital 18,260 FTE
NAT-TCR UTAS Rockford Plant 1 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nexeo Solutions- Morrisville 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC - Airport United Airlines Offices 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse), Inc. - DBA ABJ Fire Protection Syracuse location 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Place - Alton 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bombardier Transportation - Phoenix - PHX 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE CVG Cincinnati /NO KY Airport (LGSTX) 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chop Bcc 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.