Marine Warehousing and Distribution · Maryland

Rukert Terminals Corporation

Baltimore, MD · ~174 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rukert Terminals Corporation runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Marine Warehousing and Distribution workplace, earning a grade C.

Rukert Terminals Corporation: 6.1 TCR = 104% of Marine Warehousing and Distribution BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rukert Terminals Corporation safety composite

Rukert Terminals Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2018→2024

Rukert Terminals Corporation injury rate improved

Rukert Terminals Corporation's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.6 in 2018 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.6 · 2019=11.0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Baltimore, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 104% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #97/148
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Rukert Terminals Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rukert Terminals Corporation averages 6.1 TCR (104% of the Marine Warehousing and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rukert Terminals Corporation TCR series: 2018=4.6 · 2019=11 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Rukert Terminals Corporation falls in its industry

9,477 Marine Warehousing and Distrib establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 148 Marine Warehousing and Distrib employers in Maryland.

Rukert Terminals Corporation (174 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rukert Terminals Corporation
Rukert Terminals Corporation (174 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Rukert Terminals Corporation has more employees than the Marine Warehousing and Distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 6.5 4.3 10 2 0
2022 7.3 3.9 15 0 0
2021 6.8 6.3 14 0 0
2020 5.8 4.5 9 0 0
2019 11.0 6.9 19 0 0
2018 4.6 3.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MD · Baltimore

9,477 Marine Warehousing and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NK Parts Main Campus 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00010W WAXAHACHIE 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4087 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blueprint-Robotics 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE USALCO Baltimore 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-0452 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE 102318 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR EDRO Specialty Steels 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Raley's 340-Oakhurst 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fluid Line Products, Inc 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 183 - La County Metro South Ca 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE PorterMatt Electric 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Italian Bakery 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mcclellan, Ca 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Emerald Aire Inc 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.