Distribution of electric power · Minnesota

Runestone Electric Association

Alexandria, MN · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Runestone Electric Association runs at 480% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Runestone Electric Association: 5.8 TCR = 480% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Runestone Electric Association safety composite

Runestone Electric Association scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2017→2024

Runestone Electric Association injury rate improved

Runestone Electric Association's TCR fell 8.5 from 11.3 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Alexandria, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 480% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/85
  • PHOTO Jackson Purchase Ene…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson Purchase Energy Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Runestone Electric Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Runestone Electric Association averages 5.8 TCR (480% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Runestone Electric Association TCR series: 2017=11.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Runestone Electric Association falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 85 Distribution of electric power employers in Minnesota.

Runestone Electric Association (38 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Runestone Electric Association
Runestone Electric Association (38 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Runestone Electric Association has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 8.8 5.9 3 0 0
2022 8.6 2.9 3 0 0
2021 5.8 0.0 1 1 0
2020 5.8 5.8 1 1 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.3 5.7 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Alexandria

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Alexandria, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson Purchase Energy Corporation 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monroeville Crew Headquarters - APC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meridian HWY 39 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMICALOLA EMC- EDO 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pine Tree Orchard 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE LB Pork Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foley Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2528-Glyndon, MN (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas County Hospital DBA Alomere Health 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas Machine Inc. 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Extrusion Company 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Technical and Community College 385 FTE
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Orange County Placentia 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitsubishi Electric US Inc.-14 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sarale Farming Company, Inc. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Winston Salem 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chatham Fire Department 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triton Plumbing 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holton Family Health Clinic 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocking R ACE Hardware 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.