Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) · Missouri

Rusk Rehabilitation Center

Columbia, MO · ~216 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rusk Rehabilitation Center runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) workplace, earning a grade F.

Rusk Rehabilitation Center: 9.6 TCR = 253% of Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rusk Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Rusk Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rusk Rehabilitation Center held a steady TCR band

Rusk Rehabilitation Center's TCR held near 0.2 from 7.0 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=15.0 · 2018=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Columbia, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 253% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #39/40
  • PHOTO Encompass Health Dea…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~216 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Encompass Health Deaconess Rehabilitation Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Rusk Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rusk Rehabilitation Center averages 9.6 TCR (253% of the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rusk Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=15 · 2018=6.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Rusk Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 40 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce employers in Missouri.

Rusk Rehabilitation Center (216 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rusk Rehabilitation Center
Rusk Rehabilitation Center (216 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Rusk Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcohol median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.8 2.3 9 0 0
2017 15.0 4.3 21 0 0
2016 7.0 2.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · MO · Columbia

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 270 employers in Columbia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Encompass Health Deaconess Rehabilitation Hospital 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHSM Rehabilitation, LLC (d/b/a Banner Rehabilitation Hospital-East) 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regional Rehabilitation Institute 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR H4664 KH ALBUQUERQUE 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hiland Dairy Kansas City 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broadridge Financial Solutions - KC 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webster Groves 216 FTE
STATE-SIZE IKEA #410 Saint Louis 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Equipmentshare.com, Inc. 5,242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mortgage Research Center 2,903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boone Hospital Center 1,562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 684 FTE
NAT-TCR Lowell C. Hagen Trucking, Inc 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3237 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SDF-LOUISVILLE 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE MaineGeneral - Hathaway Creative Center 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE DSSA-AZ 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carbide 216 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gundersen Palmer Lutheran Hospital and Clinics 216 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.