Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) · Missouri

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital

Columbia, MO · ~214 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) workplace, earning a grade F.

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital: 8.9 TCR = 236% of Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital safety composite

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2019→2024

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital injury rate improved

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital's TCR fell 8.5 from 8.9 in 2019 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.9 · 2020=18.6 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Columbia, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 236% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #38/40
  • PHOTO Landmark Hospital Of…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Landmark Hospital Of Southwest Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital averages 8.9 TCR (236% of the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital TCR series: 2019=8.9 · 2020=18.6 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital falls in its industry

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 40 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce employers in Missouri.

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital (214 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital
Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital (214 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital has more employees than the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcohol median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.2 6 0 0
2023 7.8 6.4 6 5 0
2022 12.2 7.4 9 9 0
2021 5.7 4.3 8 0 0
2020 18.6 16.5 5 21 0
2019 8.9 5.2 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · MO · Columbia

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 270 employers in Columbia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Landmark Hospital Of Southwest Florida 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HealthSouth Valley of the Sun Rehabilitation Hospital 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MH Asheville Specialty Hospital, LLC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 19401 BSWIR- Dallas Transitional (Swiss Ave) 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE AAF Flanders Columbia 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 27 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8205 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAINT LOUIS (MOSLI) 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Equipmentshare.com, Inc. 5,242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mortgage Research Center 2,903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boone Hospital Center 1,562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 684 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakeside Organic Gardens 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unity Health Specialty Care 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Comptec Inc 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CA002MVM 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE King and Prince Beach and Golf Resort 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0847 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1155 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1488 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.