Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing · Missouri

AAF Flanders Columbia

Columbia, MO · ~214 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AAF Flanders Columbia runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

AAF Flanders Columbia: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AAF Flanders Columbia safety composite

AAF Flanders Columbia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

AAF Flanders Columbia injury rate improved

AAF Flanders Columbia's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Columbia, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO AP NC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AP NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AAF Flanders Columbia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AAF Flanders Columbia averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AAF Flanders Columbia TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where AAF Flanders Columbia falls in its industry

232 Air purification equipment, st establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Air purification equipment, st employers in Missouri.

AAF Flanders Columbia (214 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AAF Flanders Columbia
AAF Flanders Columbia (214 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

AAF Flanders Columbia has more employees than the Air purification equipment, stationary, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2023 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2022 1.4 0.9 3 0 0
2021 1.8 1.3 4 0 0
2020 1.6 0.8 4 0 0
2019 1.2 0.8 3 0 0
2018 2.6 1.3 6 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2016 2.9 1.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · MO · Columbia

232 Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 270 employers in Columbia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AP NC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camfil USA - Austin Branch 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Permatron Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Gas Engineering Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 27 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8205 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAINT LOUIS (MOSLI) 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rusk Rehabilitation Hospital 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Equipmentshare.com, Inc. 5,242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mortgage Research Center 2,903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boone Hospital Center 1,562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 684 FTE
NAT-TCR Feed Mill 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR North East 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fuserashi International Technology 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmer Logistics Warehouse 6 (AmeriPort) 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE WATERTOWN 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lee Aerospace, Inc. 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Circle Graphics - Raleigh 10700 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE OR Veterans Home - Lebanon 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.