Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Tennessee

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville

Knoxville, TN · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville: 4.7 TCR = 143% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville safety composite

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville: 4.3 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville's TCR rose 0.9 from 4.3 in 2023 to 5.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Knoxville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #50/57
  • PHOTO Alliance Packaging- …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alliance Packaging- Oaksdale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville averages 4.7 TCR (143% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville TCR series: 2023=4.3 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 57 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Tennessee.

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville (23 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville
Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville (23 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Rusken Packaging Inc. Knoxville has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · TN · Knoxville

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 747 employers in Knoxville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alliance Packaging- Oaksdale 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technicote, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diamond K Incorporated 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Packaging, Omaha 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manchester DREMC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tennessee Mechanical Contractors 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDE - Metro Nashville District Energy System 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avenue Construction 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cellular Sales Services Group LLC 6,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health System, Inc 5,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Functional Pathways of TN LLC 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services K-12 2,157 FTE
NAT-TCR Wright's Scrap Metals 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR L.W. Schneider, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Esstech, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LB Manufacturing 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Los Vientos 1A & 1B Wind Farms 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethpage 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuusakoski Glass 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Badgerland De Pere 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.