Demolition contractor · New York

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc.

Lawrence, NY · ~51 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Demolition contractor workplace, earning a grade A.

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 40% of Demolition contractor BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. safety composite

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc.: 3.2 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.73× in 2024

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 3.2 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Lawrence, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 40% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #9/70
  • PHOTO Underpinning Foundat…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Underpinning Foundation Skanska (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (40% of the Demolition contractor BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Demolition contractor establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 70 Demolition contractor employers in New York.

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. (51 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Russo Development Enterprises, Inc.
Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. (51 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Russo Development Enterprises, Inc. has more employees than the Demolition contractor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 1.9 2 0 1
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · NY · Lawrence

1,750 Demolition contractor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 18 employers in Lawrence, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Underpinning Foundation Skanska 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dirt Works Unlimited 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LP's Excavating, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR A-Jay Excavating, Inc. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Watertown Hatchery 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 124th Street Business Office 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quest Builders Group 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE RP Oak Hill Building Company Inc. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0310 - LAWRENCE NY WHSE 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 84 LAWRENCE, NY 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3382 - Lawrence Five Towns 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Park Conveyance 105 FTE
NAT-TCR SunCoke Energy Jewell Operation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NovaTech 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dora Hotel Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle Purina Pet Care - Jefferson 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE BICO Akron, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fred Christen & Sons Company - Toledo 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple City Ice Company 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE VDH Electric, Inc. 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.