General medical and surgical hospitals · North Carolina

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS

Rutherfordton, NC · ~93 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS: 3.6 TCR = 49% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS safety composite

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS: 0.0 → 8.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2024

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS's TCR rose 8.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Rutherfordton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 3.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #44/175
  • PHOTO 947 ST MARY S MEDIC…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 947 ST MARY S MEDICAL CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS averages 3.6 TCR (49% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=8 · BLS 7.5

Where Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 175 General medical and surgical h employers in North Carolina.

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS (93 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS
Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS (93 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Rutherford Physician Practices-RRHS has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 3.0 7 1 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2021 3.8 1.3 1 2 0
2020 5.4 5.4 0 4 0
2019 6.6 2.6 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.2 0.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · NC · Rutherfordton

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 20 employers in Rutherfordton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 947 ST MARY S MEDICAL CENTER 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gracie Square 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Health Allen 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henderson County Community Hospital 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Charlotte 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP-Mid Atlantic LLC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Exterior Systems 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lightserve Corporation 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rutherford Regional Medical Center 438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rutherfordton 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aallied Die Casting 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parton Lumber Company 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Grain Millers Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Days Inn 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Barclay Brook Elementary School 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Chelsea 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TXKNC, Inc. dba Bailey Creek Health & Rehab 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excel Manufacturing Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE 030-Kansas City 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.