Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers · North Carolina

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex

Charlotte, NC · ~84 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex: 1.4 TCR = 64% of Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex safety composite

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2023→2024

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex injury rate improved

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/41
  • PHOTO INFRA-METALS CO - VI…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: INFRA-METALS CO - VIRGINIA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ryerson-Charlotte Complex averages 1.4 TCR (64% of the Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex TCR series: 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Ryerson-Charlotte Complex falls in its industry

1,299 Metal products (e.g., bars, in establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 41 Metal products (e.g., bars, in employers in North Carolina.

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex (84 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ryerson-Charlotte Complex
Ryerson-Charlotte Complex (84 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Ryerson-Charlotte Complex has more employees than the Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · NC · Charlotte

1,299 Metal products (e.g., bars, ingots, plates, rods, shapes, sheets) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR INFRA-METALS CO - VIRGINIA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Friedman Sinton 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR vHPM - Houston 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpharetta ALP 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lark Maintenance Facility 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. Corporate Office 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease Charlotte 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Watford City 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Laredo 10287 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Cooling 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Run Energy, LP 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Diversified Control, Inc 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jabil Lewis Engineering 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Borman Specialty Materials 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE George W. Pynn Masonry, Inc 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.