Employer · California

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling

Chico, CA · ~67 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling: 6.0 TCR = 232% of industry BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling safety composite

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.3

2018→2024

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling injury rate improved

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling's TCR fell 12.3 from 21.8 in 2018 to 9.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=21.8 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=9.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Chico, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 232% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #112/247
  • PHOTO 5322-Mountain Waste …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5322-Mountain Waste and Recycling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling averages 6.0 TCR (232% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling TCR series: 2018=21.8 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=9.4 · BLS 2.6

Where S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 247 industry employers in California.

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling (67 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling
S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling (67 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S03198 - North Valley Disposal Recycling has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.4 6.3 6 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.3 3.2 3 1 0
2018 21.8 0.0 2 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · Chico

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 189 employers in Chico, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5322-Mountain Waste and Recycling 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solano Garbage Company 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04800 - Coal Township 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Randy's Sanitation Inc. - Delano 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sonoma GVIC Ranches 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travaille and Phippen, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nurseries 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-11 4,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enloe Medical Center Employees 3,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 72 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 521 2,370 FTE
NAT-TCR 1847 Ctv24 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Transport - 554 554SH 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 057 Fort Worth TX 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ream Roofing Associates, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Western S - IL Gas Ops 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duncan Operations Center 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Douglas Care Center 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faye Wright Senior Living 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.