Employer · Michigan

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling

Pontiac, MI · ~87 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling: 7.0 TCR = 269% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling safety composite

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling: 2.1 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.26× in 2024

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling's TCR rose 7.9 from 2.1 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Pontiac, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 269% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #54/80
  • PHOTO S03148 - WM of South…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S03148 - WM of Southern MN - Albert Lea (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S03537 - Detroit North Hauling averages 7.0 TCR (269% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 2.6

Where S03537 - Detroit North Hauling falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 80 industry employers in Michigan.

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling (87 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S03537 - Detroit North Hauling
S03537 - Detroit North Hauling (87 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S03537 - Detroit North Hauling has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 8.8 8 0 0
2023 8.7 8.7 7 0 0
2022 5.6 5.6 5 0 0
2021 8.4 6.0 7 0 0
2020 9.4 9.4 7 0 0
2019 7.1 7.1 6 1 0
2018 11.5 0.0 6 5 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MI · Pontiac

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pontiac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S03148 - WM of Southern MN - Albert Lea 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Disposal Ind. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sani-Pro Disposal Services Corp, dba Suburban Carting Co 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03798 - WM of South Louisiana 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Leitz Farms LLC 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (IL) 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walkent 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE George W. Auch Company 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 2,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Powertrain Headquaters 2,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital SJMHS MI 2,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND 1,290 FTE
NAT-TCR Alamogordo Construction Center 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexandria Workforce Center 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Municipal services 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Homestead Baking Company Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE S03774 - Richmond Hauling 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04914 - Fayetteville Hauling 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Brien Memorial Health Care Center 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixie Southern Industrial / Curry Steel 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.