Employer · Mississippi

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko

Kosciusko, MS · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko: 3.5 TCR = 135% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko safety composite

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko: 4.0 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.85× in 2024

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko's TCR rose 6.0 from 4.0 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Kosciusko, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 135% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #12/32
  • PHOTO Rochester NY Transfer
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rochester NY Transfer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko averages 3.5 TCR (135% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=0 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=10 · BLS 2.6

Where S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 32 industry employers in Mississippi.

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko (24 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko
S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko (24 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S03868 - WM of Central MS - Kosciusko has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 10.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 8.8 0.0 0 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MS · Kosciusko

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 18 employers in Kosciusko, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rochester NY Transfer 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Waste Services of North America LLC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03163 - WM of ND - Bismarck 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Rock Hauling 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laurel Office MPC3301 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Construction Group, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholas Acoustics & Specialty Company, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&T Construction, Inc 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 795 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ivey Mechanical Company 720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Attala Steel Industries 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 239 221 FTE
NAT-TCR Indy Imaging, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Bell Market LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Furniture Factory 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Environmental Services 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Blytheville, AR NYS-Nucor Yamato 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04059 - WM of Southern Colorado - Pueblo 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03507 - Southern West Virginia Hauling 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03956 - WM of Sandpoint 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.