Employer · Michigan

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling

Three Rivers, MI · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling: 4.3 TCR = 166% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling safety composite

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling injury rate improved

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling's TCR fell 4.9 from 12.7 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Three Rivers, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #24/80
  • PHOTO FCC Environmental Se…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas Collections) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling averages 4.3 TCR (166% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling TCR series: 2016=12.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 2.6

Where S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 80 industry employers in Michigan.

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling (35 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling
S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling (35 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 5.2 3 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.3 5.2 4 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 12.7 9.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MI · Three Rivers

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 41 employers in Three Rivers, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas Collections) 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johns Disposal Service, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville North 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Des Moines Recycling Collection Center 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heeren, LLC - 42 North Apples 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbor Farmz, North LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willow Point Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE POWER & UTILITIES OPERATIONS - ROB 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR AAM TRMF 1,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Health 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Hospital 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armstrong International - Three Rivers Division 289 FTE
NAT-TCR NLACRC - Antelope Valley 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Buona Terra Farming 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PA Operations 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mainas Farms LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coast Counties Peterbilt - Windsor 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castleton Lyons, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bauer Specialty Commercial Services 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aitken 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.