Social service centers, multipurpose · California

NLACRC - Antelope Valley

Lancaster, CA · ~109 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NLACRC - Antelope Valley runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Social service centers, multipurpose workplace, earning a grade C.

NLACRC - Antelope Valley: 4.3 TCR = 114% of Social service centers, multipurpose BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NLACRC - Antelope Valley safety composite

NLACRC - Antelope Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NLACRC - Antelope Valley: 2.9 → 9.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2024

NLACRC - Antelope Valley's TCR rose 6.7 from 2.9 in 2017 to 9.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 114% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #132/184
  • PHOTO Rapid City Office
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rapid City Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NLACRC - Antelope Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NLACRC - Antelope Valley averages 4.3 TCR (114% of the Social service centers, multipurpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NLACRC - Antelope Valley TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=11.4 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 3.8

Where NLACRC - Antelope Valley falls in its industry

990 Social service centers, multip establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #132 safest of 184 Social service centers, multip employers in California.

NLACRC - Antelope Valley (109 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NLACRC - Antelope Valley
NLACRC - Antelope Valley (109 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

NLACRC - Antelope Valley has more employees than the Social service centers, multipurpose median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 5.6 12 0 0
2023 11.4 10.4 8 4 0
2022 5.2 3.1 4 1 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · CA · Lancaster

990 Social service centers, multipurpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rapid City Office 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Nicholas Center for Children 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blackburn Center 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Based Therapeutic Services 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRAVANTE FARM MANAGEMENT 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Kautz Farms - Lodi, CA 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE G4 Farm Labor, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elvira Sandoval 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR S03904 - Three Rivers Hauling 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PA Operations 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Scotch Plywood Company Fulton Division 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central NM Electric Cooperative 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wrwp, LLC 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodhue ISD #253 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Mary's Alzheimer's Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor Bordentown 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.