Employer · New Mexico

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division

Hobbs, NM · ~59 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division: 5.5 TCR = 212% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division safety composite

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division injury rate improved

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division's TCR fell 3.7 from 5.2 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.2 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=18.0 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Hobbs, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 212% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Area Disposal Servic…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Area Disposal Service Inc. Jacksonville HC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division averages 5.5 TCR (212% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=18 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 2.6

Where S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 industry employers in New Mexico.

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division (59 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division
S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division (59 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2022 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 13.7 3.4 8 0 0
2018 18.0 0.0 3 7 0
2017 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.2 3.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · NM · Hobbs

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 71 employers in Hobbs, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Area Disposal Service Inc. Jacksonville HC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TrashAway Svcs (Duncan/San Angelo) - Republic Services of San Angelo 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S09359 - KC Container Repair Shop 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carlsbad Office 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metal Craft Company 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supplyone Albuquerque 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Banyan Botanicals 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 549 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR 549 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4238-130 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR USM Store #680 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 266 FTE
NAT-TCR Eagle Health & Rehabilitation 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Apostolic Christian Resthaven 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Raley's 115- Reno 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana University Health Paoli Hospital 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE BTW Inc 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flight Suits 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Econo Fence, Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gurnee Fire Department 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.