Employer · Texas

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle

Beaumont, TX · ~45 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle: 2.6 TCR = 100% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle safety composite

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle injury rate improved

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=11.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Beaumont, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/117
  • PHOTO TOWN OF EAST HADDAM
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TOWN OF EAST HADDAM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle averages 2.6 TCR (100% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=11.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 117 industry employers in Texas.

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle (45 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle
S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle (45 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S04271 - WM - Golden Triangle has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.1 3.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 0 1 0
2019 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 11.1 0.0 2 4 1
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · TX · Beaumont

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 329 employers in Beaumont, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TOWN OF EAST HADDAM 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04049 - WM of Tulsa 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR S10386 - DuBois Brockway Hauling 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5110-El Paso Hauling 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coronado Feeders 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE FireBird Energy LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Admiral Permian Resources 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cougar Completion Services LP 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaumont SCANfining Project (BMSF) 2,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas 2,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4038-1618 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR Dixie Plywood & lumber Co of Miami 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Austin Public Schools ISD#492 Southgate Elemem 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Higley Ready Mix 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Twehous Excavating Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arborview Court 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coast Counties Peterbilt - San Jose 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05723 - Port Huron Hauling 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE S08859 - WM Recycling Miami MRF 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.