Employer · California

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility

Livermore, CA · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility: 1.8 TCR = 70% of industry BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility safety composite

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2017

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility injury rate improved

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/41
  • PHOTO EnvnmtlTrust Athens
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EnvnmtlTrust Athens (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility averages 1.8 TCR (70% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.6

Where S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility falls in its industry

288 industry establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 41 industry employers in California.

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility (56 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility
S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility (56 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

S04305 - Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery Facility has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.6 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · CA · Livermore

288 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EnvnmtlTrust Athens 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S07379 - Waste Management of Fairless Hills Landfill 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03800 - WM Disp Services of ME - Crossroads 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caglia Environmental 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR 0035 - Mesa, AZ 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MIHPADM01 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Andersons Maumee Plant Nutrient 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Action Resources - Hanceville 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maryland Parkway 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADS Buena Vista 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44974 - Carolina Service Center 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 1799 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.