Adhesives and sealants merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Saba North America

Kimball, MI · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saba North America runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Adhesives and sealants merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Saba North America: 4.6 TCR = 210% of Adhesives and sealants merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saba North America safety composite

Saba North America scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Saba North America: 0.0 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 14.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Saba North America's TCR rose 7.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Kimball, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.6 · 210% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/28
  • PHOTO Chicago Glue & Machi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago Glue & Machine Location 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Saba North America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saba North America averages 4.6 TCR (210% of the Adhesives and sealants merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saba North America TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=14.1 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Saba North America falls in its industry

766 Adhesives and sealants merchan establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 28 Adhesives and sealants merchan employers in Michigan.

Saba North America (20 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Saba North America
Saba North America (20 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Saba North America has fewer employees than the Adhesives and sealants merchant wholesal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 14.1 0.0 3 0 0
2019 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · MI · Kimball

766 Adhesives and sealants merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 7 employers in Kimball, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago Glue & Machine Location 1 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring WTG 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Facilities 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manassas Park Packaged Gas Store 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tholrund Brothers 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indeck Niles Energy Center 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Solar Solutions West 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-Star Roofing & Sheet Metal 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR KIMBALL MI 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Woods Elementary School 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kimball Elementary School 40 FTE
NAT-TCR Growmark Fs, LLC - East Berlin 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jennie Stuart Medical Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kraiburg Tpe Corp 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stine DeRidder 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Burbank - Parks and Recreation - Aquatics/McCambridge 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Growmark Fs, LLC - Caledonia 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morrissey Hospitality 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crossnore Communities for Children - Hendersonville Campus 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.