Distribution of electric power · California

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

Sacramento, CA · ~2,284 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sacramento Municipal Utility District runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Sacramento Municipal Utility District: 2.5 TCR = 204% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sacramento Municipal Utility District safety composite

Sacramento Municipal Utility District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2024

Sacramento Municipal Utility District injury rate improved

Sacramento Municipal Utility District's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.9 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 204% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #67/260
  • PHOTO Owensboro
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 396 inj
  • SIZE ~2,284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Owensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sacramento Municipal Utility District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sacramento Municipal Utility District averages 2.5 TCR (204% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sacramento Municipal Utility District TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=4 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Sacramento Municipal Utility District falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 260 Distribution of electric power employers in California.

Sacramento Municipal Utility District (2,284 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (2,284 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sacramento Municipal Utility District has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.7 27 1 0
2023 2.0 0.8 42 0 0
2022 1.3 0.5 25 1 0
2021 2.2 0.8 41 4 0
2020 2.7 1.2 55 2 0
2019 2.3 1.1 47 1 0
2018 4.0 1.0 81 4 0
2017 3.9 1.6 78 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · CA · Sacramento

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Owensboro 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTHAMPTON-MA32 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lubbock Operations Center-119 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Avenue Service Center-198 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS 2,285 FTE
STATE-SIZE County of Imperial 2,285 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rancho Nuevo Harvesting, Inc. 2,290 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA131 PROVIDENCE SAINT JOSEPH MEDICAL CTR-BURB 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR South Weber RMC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UMCasRioGrande957 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR VitroCom Headquarters 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Asphalt Contractors, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holy Cross Home Health 2,283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Sinai Medical Center 2,282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bally'S Atlantic City Hotel and Casino 2,286 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honeywell Process Solutions Field Operations U.S. 2,282 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.