Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass · New Jersey

VitroCom Headquarters

Mountain Lakes, NJ · ~27 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

VitroCom Headquarters runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade B.

VitroCom Headquarters: 2.5 TCR = 74% of Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

VitroCom Headquarters safety composite

VitroCom Headquarters scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

VitroCom Headquarters held a steady TCR band

VitroCom Headquarters's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.1 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Mountain Lakes, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Cardinal IG - Hood R…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal IG - Hood River IG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

VitroCom Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows VitroCom Headquarters averages 2.5 TCR (74% of the Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

VitroCom Headquarters TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where VitroCom Headquarters falls in its industry

441 Glass products (except packagi establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Glass products (except packagi employers in New Jersey.

VitroCom Headquarters (27 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate VitroCom Headquarters
VitroCom Headquarters (27 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

VitroCom Headquarters has fewer employees than the Glass products (except packaging contain median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · NJ · Mountain Lakes

441 Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 8 employers in Mountain Lakes, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal IG - Hood River IG 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NSG Group Austin 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal LG - Ocala LG 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal CG -Casa Grande CG 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES INC. - CHATSWORTH RECEIVING 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concentric Group LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pact Two, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Bridges-NYST 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sloan & Company, Inc 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flash Global Logistics - NJ 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 60109 SUNRISE OF MOUNTAIN LAKES NJ 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAWA SITE - 8488 54 FTE
NAT-TCR Asphalt Contractors, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UMCasRioGrande957 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sacramento Municipal Utility District 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR South Weber RMC 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waterproofing Specialists, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Treadwell Corporation 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE JMC of Jonesboro, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri Bak Dairy, LLC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.