Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Texas

Safran Electrical & Power

Denton, TX · ~675 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Safran Electrical & Power runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Safran Electrical & Power: 2.3 TCR = 71% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Safran Electrical & Power safety composite

Safran Electrical & Power scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Safran Electrical & Power injury rate improved

Safran Electrical & Power's TCR fell 0.7 from 2.7 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Denton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #25/39
  • PHOTO Orion Industries
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~675 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orion Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Safran Electrical & Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Safran Electrical & Power averages 2.3 TCR (71% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Safran Electrical & Power TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Safran Electrical & Power falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 39 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Texas.

Safran Electrical & Power (675 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Safran Electrical & Power
Safran Electrical & Power (675 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Safran Electrical & Power has more employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.3 11 0 0
2016 2.7 0.8 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · TX · Denton

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 211 employers in Denton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orion Industries 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SNA - Cottonwood Falls 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Umbra Cuscinetti, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intrex Aerospace 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 0030-HES Victoria 675 FTE
STATE-SIZE Memorial Hermann Sugar Land Hospital 675 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sherman 675 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCorvey Sheet Metal 674 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Paccar 2,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Motors Company 2,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Denton 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR 060 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton 1,040 FTE
NAT-TCR 740 Fre25 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oaks at West Cobb 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marc Glassman Inc 41SG 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kannapolis 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Duncan Aviation - Battle Creek 675 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville County Disabilities and Special Needs Board dba Thrive Upstate 675 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cobalt Boats, LLC 675 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commerce HUB 675 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.