Aircraft flight instruments (except engine instruments) manufacturing · Washington

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond

Redmond, WA · ~215 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft flight instruments (except engine instruments) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Aircraft flight instruments (except engine instruments) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond safety composite

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond held a steady TCR band

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.8 in 2023 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.8 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Redmond, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO Middletown RI
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Middletown RI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Aircraft flight instruments (except engine instruments) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond TCR series: 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond falls in its industry

388 Aircraft flight instruments (e establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 Aircraft flight instruments (e employers in Washington.

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond (215 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond
Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond (215 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond has more employees than the Aircraft flight instruments (except engi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · WA · Redmond

388 Aircraft flight instruments (except engine instruments) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Middletown RI 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Space and Airborne Systems : CA, San Diego - 9020 Balboa Ave. (SAS-SS) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins (Bellevue IA) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Bay FL 2400 Palm Bay Rd 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alliance Packaging- Oaksdale 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc. 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3053 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 701-00664 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR The Richmond Group 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GBA Builders LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Weldtech Services, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PEWAUKEE 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Williamsport Home 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farrell Distributing 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feintool Tennessee, Inc. 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Construction Company 215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.