Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) · Michigan

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations

Saginaw, MI · ~546 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) workplace, earning a grade C.

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations safety composite

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations injury rate improved

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.6 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331524 · Saginaw, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Carley Foundry, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~546 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carley Foundry, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saginaw Metal Casting Operations averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=5 · 2021=2.8 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Saginaw Metal Casting Operations falls in its industry

156 Aluminum foundries (except die establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Aluminum foundries (except die employers in Michigan.

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations (546 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Saginaw Metal Casting Operations
Saginaw Metal Casting Operations (546 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Saginaw Metal Casting Operations has more employees than the Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.4 5 6 0
2023 2.7 2.2 10 2 0
2021 2.8 0.8 6 8 0
2020 5.0 1.3 9 17 0
2019 4.1 1.4 13 16 0
2018 3.5 1.5 13 13 0
2017 2.4 0.7 6 11 0
2016 3.6 1.5 11 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331524 · MI · Saginaw

156 Aluminum foundries (except die-casting) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 278 employers in Saginaw, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carley Foundry, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR B and C Castings 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Celina Aluminum Precision Technology Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRP US Inc. Spruce Pine 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BROWNSTOWN COMPLEX 546 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bandit Industries, Inc. - Main 547 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ultra-Dex, LLC 545 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI-BRIGH01 544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 700 Cooper 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morley - Saginaw 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caravan Facilities Management 1,677 FTE
NAT-TCR Veliz Company, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Recycling Corp 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Beaverton Motorcycles 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR White-Brook Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sterilite Corporation OHO 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE Human Service Center Swinburne 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE BIC Charlotte Packaging 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE POTTER STRUCTURES, Ltd. 546 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.