Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Washington

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup

Puyallup, WA · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup safety composite

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup held a steady TCR band

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Puyallup, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/47
  • PHOTO Goodrich Corporation…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 47 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Washington.

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup
Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Saint-Gobain Aerospace Puyallup has fewer employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Puyallup

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 172 employers in Puyallup, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGDS-R955 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace Inc (WinstonSalem NC Fairchild 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC (Sterling VA) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wapatox 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canoe Ridge Estate Vineyards #12 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Long Ranch LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE SS BAILEY NURSERIES INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR MultiCare Good Samaritan Hospital (Company 15) 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital 2,622 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA014 1,248 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEFNCO Communications 999 FTE
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schaffer Grinding Co. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE QCDRM - Albuquerque 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swg Yuma Dist Ofc & Ops Cntr 0048-Fac41 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 136 San Francisco Gallery 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.