Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Minnesota

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN

Minneapolis, MN · ~46 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN runs at 326% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade F.

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN: 1.6 TCR = 326% of Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN safety composite

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.92× in 2022

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN's TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.6 · 326% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Corteva - Marion, IA
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corteva - Marion, IA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN averages 1.6 TCR (326% of the Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=3.1 · BLS 0.5

Where Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN falls in its industry

319 Life sciences research and dev establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Life sciences research and dev employers in Minnesota.

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN (46 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN
Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN (46 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Saint-Gobain, Plymouth MN has fewer employees than the Life sciences research and development l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · MN · Minneapolis

319 Life sciences research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corteva - Marion, IA 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyster-Yale Group - Fairview, Oregon 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR C6-NC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10 Tyler Street 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canby 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elk River Municipal Utilities 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE District Energy Saint Paul 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Berkeley Boulevard 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG553 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Global 1 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR BD Columbus West 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6957-DAY 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE APS,LLC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Line Equipment- Muncy 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.