Grains, abrasive, natural and artificial, manufacturing · New York

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded)

Niagara Falls, NY · ~68 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Grains, abrasive, natural and artificial, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded): 3.3 TCR = 100% of Grains, abrasive, natural and artificial, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) safety composite

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded): 2.5 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded)'s TCR rose 1.1 from 2.5 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327910 · Niagara Falls, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #7/15
  • PHOTO Abrasive Technology …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Grains, abrasive, natural and artificial, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) TCR series: 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=1.8 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) falls in its industry

90 Grains, abrasive, natural and establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 15 Grains, abrasive, natural and employers in New York.

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) (68 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded)
Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) (68 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) has more employees than the Grains, abrasive, natural and artificial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 5.1 3.4 2 1 0
2020 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327910 · NY · Niagara Falls

90 Grains, abrasive, natural and artificial, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 107 employers in Niagara Falls, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro Surface Finishing 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Gobain Huntsville 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Carol Stream 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunnyside Farms, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Farms LLC 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE CURTIN DAIRY 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stauffer Farms LLC 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Venture Forthe 1,711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sevenson overall injury report 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Company 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1909 421 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Superior School District 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mancon Hrso 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mansfield OH FXFE-MFD 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Johansen Mechanical, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Watermark at Continental Ranch 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fras-le North America 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plaza Administration Building 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.