Abrasive products manufacturing · Ohio

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio)

Lewis Center, OH · ~173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Abrasive products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio): 3.3 TCR = 100% of Abrasive products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) safety composite

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2018→2020

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) injury rate improved

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio)'s TCR fell 2.8 from 5.8 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.8 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327910 · Lewis Center, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #5/11
  • PHOTO Saint-Gobain Wheatfi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Abrasive products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) TCR series: 2018=5.8 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) falls in its industry

90 Abrasive products manufacturin establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Abrasive products manufacturin employers in Ohio.

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) (173 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio)
Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) (173 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Abrasive Technology (Lewis Center, Ohio) has more employees than the Abrasive products manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.0 2.2 3 1 0
2019 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 5.8 2.6 6 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327910 · OH · Lewis Center

90 Abrasive products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 55 employers in Lewis Center, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Wheatfield, NY (Seeded) 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro Surface Finishing 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Gobain Huntsville 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Carol Stream 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shelly Northwest construction 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weidmann Electrical Technology Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArcelorMittal Warren (EIN 043634649) 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Communications Technologies, Inc. 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATS Ohio, Inc. 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2725 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2725 282 FTE
NAT-TCR Custom Drum Services, Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pilgrims Russellville Complex 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rifenburg Construction, Inc.-North Carloina 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Worth-Meacham 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rac Denver 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Bouchard & Sons Co. 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danbury MFG (EF,IND) 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tecomet Kenosha 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.