Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · California

Salem Christian Homes, Inc.

Chino, CA · ~189 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade C.

Salem Christian Homes, Inc.: 4.4 TCR = 116% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. safety composite

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.8

2018→2019

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. injury rate improved

Salem Christian Homes, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.8 from 8.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 116% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/151
  • PHOTO Community Living Opt…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Living Options (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salem Christian Homes, Inc. averages 4.4 TCR (116% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. TCR series: 2018=8.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Salem Christian Homes, Inc. falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 151 Intellectual and developmental employers in California.

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. (189 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Salem Christian Homes, Inc.
Salem Christian Homes, Inc. (189 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Salem Christian Homes, Inc. has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.8 5.6 9 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · CA · Chino

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Living Options 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-482271 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARCA (corporate) 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autism Learning Partners Glendale 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fallbrook 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Youngstown Grape Dist., Inc 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moonlight Companies Plant 4/MCSI 4 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sentinel Peak Resources 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR 23 - Kansas City Kimball Drive 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Midco Commercial 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TNI - Napoleon, OH 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-Swy 0035 2853 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Innocor Foam Technologies, LLC - Coldwater 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Speedway Corporation 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICP 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aloft & Element Austin Dt 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.