Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pins, handles, textile machinery accessories), manufacturing · Indiana

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co

Salem, IN · ~45 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pins, handles, textile machinery accessories), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pins, handles, textile machinery accessories), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co safety composite

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co: 2.0 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co's TCR rose 4.2 from 2.0 in 2021 to 6.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · Salem, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/18
  • PHOTO Mansfield
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mansfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salem Hardwood Lumber Co averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pins, handles, textile machinery accessories), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co TCR series: 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Salem Hardwood Lumber Co falls in its industry

905 Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pi establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 18 Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pi employers in Indiana.

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co (45 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Salem Hardwood Lumber Co
Salem Hardwood Lumber Co (45 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Salem Hardwood Lumber Co has fewer employees than the Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pins, handle median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.2 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · IN · Salem

905 Blanks, wood (e.g., bowling pins, handles, textile machinery accessories), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 24 employers in Salem, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mansfield 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interfor 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suwannee Lumber Company 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&B Lumber Company,Inc. (McConnellsville) 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE J Star Farms LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windfall, IN 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Oil Field Services LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patoka Lake Regional Water & Sewer District 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Sinter Metals - Salem, Indiana 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kimball Salem 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Sinter Metals 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8027611-GKN 339 FTE
NAT-TCR C&W Global - Winter Garden 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR S04071 - Austin Community RDF 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR S04103 - Springhill Reg Sanitary Landfill 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyoming #173 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE AIG Alabama 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Worley Field Services at Mosaic Baton Rouge Operations 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Worley Field Services at ConocoPhillips Alpine 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Oaks Residential Treatment Center 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.