Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors · California

Salsbury Engineering, Inc.

Anaheim, CA · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Salsbury Engineering, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 57% of Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Salsbury Engineering, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Anaheim, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/184
  • PHOTO Simpson Trucking & G…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Simpson Trucking & Grading Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salsbury Engineering, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (57% of the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Salsbury Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or la establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 184 Excavating, earthmoving, or la employers in California.

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Salsbury Engineering, Inc.
Salsbury Engineering, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Salsbury Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · CA · Anaheim

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Simpson Trucking & Grading Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOWEN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KCG 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR W&D Navis, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Coventry Grammar School 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR STS Operating - Baton Rouge 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomp's Tire - East Green Bay 001 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliant Mechanical Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Plant 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammell Equipment Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Department of Human Resources 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ken's Fresh Foods 2 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.