Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Arizona

Salt River Project District Valley

Tempe, AZ · ~4,655 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Salt River Project District Valley runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Salt River Project District Valley: 1.1 TCR = 96% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Salt River Project District Valley safety composite

Salt River Project District Valley scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Salt River Project District Valley: 0.7 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2022

Salt River Project District Valley's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.7 in 2019 to 1.6 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Tempe, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 96% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #4/13
  • PHOTO 00708 DAVE JOHNSTON …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 94 inj
  • SIZE ~4,655 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00708 DAVE JOHNSTON PLNT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Salt River Project District Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Salt River Project District Valley averages 1.1 TCR (96% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Salt River Project District Valley TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Salt River Project District Valley falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 13 Electric power generation, fos employers in Arizona.

Salt River Project District Valley (4,655 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Salt River Project District Valley
Salt River Project District Valley (4,655 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Salt River Project District Valley has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.6 1.3 42 29 1
2021 1.2 1.1 30 21 1
2019 0.7 0.5 22 11 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · Tempe

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 569 employers in Tempe, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00708 DAVE JOHNSTON PLNT 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generation Fossil Barry Steam Plant 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanford Plant 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middletown Power LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 202376 4,627 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Plants and Offices 4,518 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZ-02 4,429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Communications, LLC 3,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Tempe 2,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sundt Construction Inc 2,582 FTE
CITY-NEAR HoneywellAZ18 1,900 FTE
NAT-TCR 44931 - Orlando South Fac. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresh Kills Substation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Purina Animal Feed 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Burbank Housing Property Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE DENSO Manufacturing Tennessee, Inc. 4,655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation 4,657 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkview North Hospital 4,648 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BWI2 4,646 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.