Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Oregon

Samtec Cable

Wilsonville, OR · ~74 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samtec Cable runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Samtec Cable: 3.7 TCR = 112% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samtec Cable safety composite

Samtec Cable scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Samtec Cable: 0.0 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2024

Samtec Cable's TCR rose 4.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Wilsonville, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 112% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK P11
  • PHOTO Amphenol Spectra-Strip
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amphenol Spectra-Strip (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Samtec Cable in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Samtec Cable averages 3.7 TCR (112% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Samtec Cable TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2023=16 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Samtec Cable falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Samtec Cable (74 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Samtec Cable
Samtec Cable (74 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Samtec Cable has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 0.7 6 0 0
2023 16.0 8.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · OR · Wilsonville

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 102 employers in Wilsonville, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Spectra-Strip 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Connectors & Cable Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cinch Connectivity Solutions, Inc 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCB Piezotronics / Machine Shop PMC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE GF Managment Company 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goschie Farms 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fitzpatrick Painting Inc 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Civic Construction, LLC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins Inc (Wilsonville OR) 626 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco of Portland 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Wilsonville 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coho Distributing LLC - Wilsonville 507 FTE
NAT-TCR Metro Transit Light Rail Operations and Maintenance 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S04140 - Philadelphia Hauling - Delaware Valley North 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bayes, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Navco Berry Harvest 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charlotte Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baltimore Branch 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Tampa HUB 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE EPPA North Memorial Hospital 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.