Commercial building construction general contractors · New Jersey

DPR Construction - New Jersey

Edison, NJ · ~120 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DPR Construction - New Jersey runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

DPR Construction - New Jersey: 2.5 TCR = 85% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DPR Construction - New Jersey safety composite

DPR Construction - New Jersey scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.9

2017→2024

DPR Construction - New Jersey injury rate improved

DPR Construction - New Jersey's TCR fell 9.9 from 12.1 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Edison, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 85% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #43/66
  • PHOTO 1005 - BELFOR Sterli…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1005 - BELFOR Sterling VA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

DPR Construction - New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DPR Construction - New Jersey averages 2.5 TCR (85% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DPR Construction - New Jersey TCR series: 2017=12.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.9

Where DPR Construction - New Jersey falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 66 Commercial building constructi employers in New Jersey.

DPR Construction - New Jersey (120 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate DPR Construction - New Jersey
DPR Construction - New Jersey (120 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

DPR Construction - New Jersey has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.1 6 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 5 0 0
2022 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.1 6.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NJ · Edison

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 227 employers in Edison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1005 - BELFOR Sterling VA 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelly Construction Group, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tellepsen Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6728-00030013-48 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dobco, Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Long Branch Facility 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biazzo 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenhorse Media LLC 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK MEDICAL CENTER 3,904 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony M Yalensics / JFK 3,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 2,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 2,437 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Mt San Antonio College 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lincoln County School District 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Buda TX Yard 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte NC Yard 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Samtec Microelectronics 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Branch 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agoura 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Valley 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.