General warehousing and storage · Texas

San Antonio, DC

San Antonio, TX · ~671 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Antonio, DC runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade B.

San Antonio, DC: 2.9 TCR = 50% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Antonio, DC safety composite

San Antonio, DC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

San Antonio, DC injury rate improved

San Antonio, DC's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.1 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 50% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #444/846
  • PHOTO Youngstown Warehouse…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 152 inj
  • SIZE ~671 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Youngstown Warehouse - 02 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

San Antonio, DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Antonio, DC averages 2.9 TCR (50% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Antonio, DC TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 5.8

Where San Antonio, DC falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #444 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

San Antonio, DC (671 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate San Antonio, DC
San Antonio, DC (671 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

San Antonio, DC has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.3 18 0 0
2023 2.0 1.7 14 0 0
2022 2.3 1.8 17 0 0
2021 2.9 2.3 19 0 0
2020 4.8 3.3 28 0 0
2019 1.9 1.6 10 0 0
2018 2.5 2.0 14 0 0
2017 3.2 2.6 15 0 0
2016 4.1 3.8 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · San Antonio

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Youngstown Warehouse - 02 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eldridge IA 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 19200 Treat Road Walton Hills OH 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SWI1 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant 672 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longview TX Distribution 670 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX_San Antonio_10130 Highway 151_ TWCUSHWY 672 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2576-62 672 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Ne-Co Asphalt Co., Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Transystems LLC - East Grand Forks Project 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Youngstown, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlie C's IGA #800 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-CA 671 FTE
NAT-SIZE Decatur Fresh Plant 671 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashby Ponds 671 FTE
NAT-SIZE AdventHealth New Smyrna Beach 671 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.