Electric power generation, nuclear · Texas

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant

Glen Rose, TX · ~672 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant: 0.1 TCR = 12% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant safety composite

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant held a steady TCR band

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Glen Rose, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK P68
  • PHOTO Clinton Power Station
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~672 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clinton Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant averages 0.1 TCR (12% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (672 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (672 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.1 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.3 0.1 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · TX · Glen Rose

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 11 employers in Glen Rose, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clinton Power Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Limerick Generating Station 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Nuclear Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE TX_San Antonio_10130 Highway 151_ TWCUSHWY 672 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2576-62 672 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Antonio, DC 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baylor Medical Center at McKinney 673 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glen Rose Medical Center 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Glen Rose Plant 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glen Rose Nursing and Rehab 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fossil Rim Wildlife Center 96 FTE
NAT-TCR Livermore, CA - 5699 Las Positas Road 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dubak Electrical Maintenance Corporation 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Arkema, Inc. King of Prussia 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR National Inspection Services, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moses Lake, WA 672 FTE
NAT-SIZE DEP001 - DEEP Central Office 672 FTE
NAT-SIZE NC_Charlotte_8336 Forest Point Blvd_NC017900 672 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulsa General Ofc 672 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.