Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · California

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority

Cardiff By the Sea, CA · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade B.

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority: 0.7 TCR = 60% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority safety composite

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority held a steady TCR band

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Cardiff By the Sea, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/74
  • PHOTO Middle River WWTP
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Middle River WWTP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Elijo Joint Powers Authority averages 0.7 TCR (60% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where San Elijo Joint Powers Authority falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 74 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in California.

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority (26 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate San Elijo Joint Powers Authority
San Elijo Joint Powers Authority (26 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

San Elijo Joint Powers Authority has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Cardiff By the Sea

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Middle River WWTP 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bozeman Inc DBA Wastewater Treatment Systems & Operations 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office Building 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - NORTH MIAMI BEACH - OMI 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Silgan Specialty Packaging 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 111 Zumbehl 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MRB Contractors, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Guido Construction Company Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE WEB Construction Co., Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nvfal - Fallon Center 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mtlew - Lewistown 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardee Energy Center 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.