Assessor's offices, tax · California

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk

Stockton, CA · ~101 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assessor's offices, tax workplace, earning a grade A.

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Assessor's offices, tax BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk safety composite

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2023 to 1.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921130 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/20
  • PHOTO Tax - Greensboro
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tax - Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Assessor's offices, tax BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.2

Where San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk falls in its industry

104 Assessor's offices, tax establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 20 Assessor's offices, tax employers in California.

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk (101 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk
San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk (101 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 1.0

San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk has more employees than the Assessor's offices, tax median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921130 · CA · Stockton

104 Assessor's offices, tax employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tax - Greensboro 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auditor-Controller's Office 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Assessor 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawaii District Office 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kirschenmann Farms, Inc 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & R Company 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Sun Grower Services 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camacho FLC, Inc 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-620 LOWES BLVD 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bhsan-Frmc1-Bhealth-Sandusky County 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Supportive Living LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Raeco Builders LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 106 Ballwin 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harbor Village at Harbor Shores LLC 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flonr - Orlando Air Sort Facility 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohdef - Defiance 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.