Environmental health program administration · California

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department

Stockton, CA · ~67 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Environmental health program administration workplace, earning a grade C.

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department: 3.0 TCR = 93% of Environmental health program administration BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department safety composite

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2020

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department injury rate improved

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/66
  • PHOTO HHSA #2
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HHSA #2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department averages 3.0 TCR (93% of the Environmental health program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2

Where San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department falls in its industry

267 Environmental health program a establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 66 Environmental health program a employers in California.

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (67 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department
San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (67 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department has fewer employees than the Environmental health program administrat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.9 0.0 4 0 0
2018 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.1 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · CA · Stockton

267 Environmental health program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HHSA #2 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6935-HEALTH-HEALTH DEPT 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (33) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coos Health & Wellness 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sonoma GVIC Ranches 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travaille and Phippen, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nurseries 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Biery Cheese Company Plover 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia Beach VA Store 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mix Rite Agri-Service LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BF Goodrich Tire Mfg 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Portland PO 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hershey Laundry & Dry Cleaning 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Louis Cold Drawn, LLC 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medspeed Sioux Fall 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.