Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · California

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc.

Stockton, CA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. runs at 416% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc.: 11.6 TCR = 416% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. safety composite

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2024

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. injury rate improved

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 12.8 in 2017 to 9.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.8 · 2018=15.3 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=21.8 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=9.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Stockton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 416% of ind

  • DART 9.8 DART
  • RANK #88/96
  • PHOTO Steel Erectors Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Steel Erectors Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. averages 11.6 TCR (416% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. TCR series: 2017=12.8 · 2018=15.3 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=21.8 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=9.8 · BLS 2.8

Where San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 96 Structural steel erecting or i employers in California.

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc.
San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.8 9.8 1 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 21.8 3.1 7 0 0
2020 12.3 6.2 4 0 0
2019 14.2 5.7 4 1 0
2018 15.3 3.1 4 1 0
2017 12.8 3.2 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · CA · Stockton

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Steel Erectors Inc 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR STEELTECH REINFORCING, INC. 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tangerine Road 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Morris Coupling Company 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LifeServe Blood Center - Sioux City 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bravo Trailers LLC 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CCI - Construction Sites 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hunsaker Exteriors 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richard's Fence Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovation Mold & Design, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mi - Gm Ppo 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.