Chains, power transmission, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Morris Coupling Company

Erie, PA · ~53 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Morris Coupling Company runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chains, power transmission, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Morris Coupling Company: 11.6 TCR = 353% of Chains, power transmission, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Morris Coupling Company safety composite

Morris Coupling Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

Morris Coupling Company injury rate improved

Morris Coupling Company's TCR fell 2.5 from 8.9 in 2017 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.9 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=14.8 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333613 · Erie, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 353% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Barnes Industries
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barnes Industries (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Morris Coupling Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Morris Coupling Company averages 11.6 TCR (353% of the Chains, power transmission, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Morris Coupling Company TCR series: 2017=8.9 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=14.8 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Morris Coupling Company falls in its industry

111 Chains, power transmission, ma establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Chains, power transmission, ma employers in Pennsylvania.

Morris Coupling Company (53 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Morris Coupling Company
Morris Coupling Company (53 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Morris Coupling Company has fewer employees than the Chains, power transmission, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 4.3 2 1 0
2023 12.5 10.4 5 1 0
2022 13.1 8.7 6 0 0
2021 16.3 11.7 7 0 0
2020 14.8 9.9 6 0 0
2019 9.5 9.5 4 0 0
2017 8.9 8.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333613 · PA · Erie

111 Chains, power transmission, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 473 employers in Erie, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barnes Industries 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Babbitt Bearing 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Zeeland Manufacturing, Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powertrain Rockford 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Appalachian Drillers, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUSSC Susquehanna Service Center 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE 301-NiSource-Uniontown PA 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG PHL- RIO 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Erie, PA 5,403 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Hamot 2,675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wabtec-Erie 2,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAINT VINCENT HOSPITAL 2,135 FTE
NAT-TCR San Joaquin Steel Co, Inc. 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LifeServe Blood Center - Sioux City 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0244 Huntington Beach 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alameda Care Center 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arvin-Edison Water Storage District 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cloverdale Dairy LLC 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Cable 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 124 Hilton Garden Inn 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.