Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables · California

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc.

Crows Landing, CA · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables workplace, earning a grade B.

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 51% of Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. safety composite

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2018→2020

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. injury rate improved

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.9 from 6.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Crows Landing, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/236
  • PHOTO Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl' Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (51% of the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. TCR series: 2018=6.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. falls in its industry

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 236 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an employers in California.

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc.
San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

San Joaquin Tomato Growers, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.9 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Crows Landing

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Crows Landing, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl' Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kunia, HI - Foundation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmer City, IL 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perez Farms 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. - CROWS LANDING 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covanta Stanislaus, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alamo Dairy Farms LLC 38 FTE
NAT-TCR Lennar - Orlando South 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cargill Agricultural Supply Chain - Cedar Rapids West 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1541 Alta Drive 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HTI Lexington 7 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASI Dallas Corp 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deroche Canvas 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marinemax Northeast, LLC-Ct1 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennova Healthcare - Lebanon 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.