Beverages, fruit and vegetable drinks, cocktails, and ades, manufacturing · California

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates

Fresno, CA · ~70 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Beverages, fruit and vegetable drinks, cocktails, and ades, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates: 3.8 TCR = 116% of Beverages, fruit and vegetable drinks, cocktails, and ades, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates safety composite

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2018

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates injury rate improved

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates's TCR fell 2.2 from 4.9 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.9 · 2018=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 116% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #17/43
  • PHOTO RIVIERA BEACH FL
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RIVIERA BEACH FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Joaquin Valley Concentrates averages 3.8 TCR (116% of the Beverages, fruit and vegetable drinks, cocktails, and ades, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates TCR series: 2017=4.9 · 2018=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where San Joaquin Valley Concentrates falls in its industry

516 Beverages, fruit and vegetable establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 43 Beverages, fruit and vegetable employers in California.

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates (70 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate San Joaquin Valley Concentrates
San Joaquin Valley Concentrates (70 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

San Joaquin Valley Concentrates has fewer employees than the Beverages, fruit and vegetable drinks, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2017 4.9 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · CA · Fresno

516 Beverages, fruit and vegetable drinks, cocktails, and ades, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RIVIERA BEACH FL 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunny Delight Beverages Company Atlanta 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marion 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunny Delight Beverages 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heritage Land Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ceballos Ag Services, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRTHN 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE EW Merritt Farms 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Knapheide truck equipment Orlando 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Supervalu Distribution Center - Mechanicsville 34411 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5324 Reynoldsburg, O 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Linel a Divison of Mestek 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE USC Jenna 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE MVRBC - Maryland Heights 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Jewett Parkway 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Rosewood Retirement Community 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.