Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

San Jose Warehouse

San Jose, CA · ~125 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Jose Warehouse runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

San Jose Warehouse: 13.6 TCR = 208% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Jose Warehouse safety composite

San Jose Warehouse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

San Jose Warehouse: 7.1 → 20.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 20.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.48× in 2022

San Jose Warehouse's TCR rose 12.9 from 7.1 in 2020 to 20.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 208% of ind

  • DART 20.0 DART
  • RANK #474/710
  • PHOTO Kenlink Logistics Li…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kenlink Logistics Limited (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Jose Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Jose Warehouse averages 13.6 TCR (208% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Jose Warehouse TCR series: 2020=7.1 · 2022=20 · BLS 6.5

Where San Jose Warehouse falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #474 safest of 710 Express delivery services (exc employers in California.

San Jose Warehouse (125 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate San Jose Warehouse
San Jose Warehouse (125 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

San Jose Warehouse has more employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 20.0 20.0 12 0 0
2020 7.1 4.1 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · San Jose

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kenlink Logistics Limited 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Assured Xpress LLC 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL-NA : Tampa Bay Delivery Service LLC 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORALD - ALDERWOOD HUB 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maywood Farms 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowland Vineyard Management, Inc. 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ventura Pacific 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Farms LLC 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Connecticut 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Watermark at St. Peters 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pleasant Manor 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brakebush Wells 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02855 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4339 Baltimore Container 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE CO012 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #501 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.