Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · California

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

Riverside, CA · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade D.

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority: 2.3 TCR = 194% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority safety composite

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2024

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority injury rate improved

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Riverside, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.3 · 194% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/74
  • PHOTO OCSD Plant 1
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OCSD Plant 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority averages 2.3 TCR (194% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 74 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in California.

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (28 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (28 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.8 8.8 0 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Riverside

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OCSD Plant 1 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Celebration 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prince William County Service Authority 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR Cargill Dry Corn Ingredients - Paris 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Frye Regional Medical Center - EVS 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FM3 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 178 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE McFarlan Home 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jiffy Steamer Company, LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Hardware Grayslake 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ollies 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.