Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Virginia

Prince William County Service Authority

Woodbridge, VA · ~422 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prince William County Service Authority runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade D.

Prince William County Service Authority: 2.4 TCR = 196% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prince William County Service Authority safety composite

Prince William County Service Authority scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Prince William County Service Authority: 1.6 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

Prince William County Service Authority's TCR rose 1.5 from 1.6 in 2023 to 3.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Woodbridge, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.4 · 196% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #9/26
  • PHOTO Celebration
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~422 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Celebration (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Prince William County Service Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prince William County Service Authority averages 2.4 TCR (196% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prince William County Service Authority TCR series: 2023=1.6 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Prince William County Service Authority falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 26 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Virginia.

Prince William County Service Authority (422 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Prince William County Service Authority
Prince William County Service Authority (422 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Prince William County Service Authority has more employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.9 9 1 0
2023 1.6 1.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · VA · Woodbridge

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 124 employers in Woodbridge, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Celebration 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CENTRAL VALLEY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCSD Plant 1 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE VALLEYS, INC. ROANOKE JOB CAMPUS 19 422 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4795-PD-DCA-WASHINGTON - REAGAN NATIONAL-PD 422 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fire Department 422 FTE
STATE-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 23 421 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center 1,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zeiders Enterprises Inc. 890 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1852 491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Potomac Mills 055 467 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Hampton Cove 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aultman Woodlawn 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Occasions Group - ID - 0156-IDRE1 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nibrock, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE ColourPop Cosmetics 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSA OCPC call Center 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anacortes Refinery 422 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caf Management, LLC 422 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.